Diaz v. Hudson
George DIAZ v. Holton HUDSON
Diaz v. Hudson, 191 So. 2d 277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Brooks v. Peters, 157 Fla. 141 , 25 So.2d 205 (1946).
RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and SACK, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.