Forkey v. Perrine Center Pharmacy
Gladys FORKEY v. PERRINE CENTER PHARMACY, Highway Insurance Company and Florida Industrial Commission
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date 'October 24, 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petition for attorneys’ fees of petitioner is also denied.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.