Mutual Employees Trademart v. Silverman
MUTUAL EMPLOYEES TRADEMART, a Delaware corporation v. Jack SILVERMAN and Max L. Cohen, as Trustees
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
HENDRY, Judge.
The question presented is whether a prorated portion of a real estate brokerage commission is recoverable as damages by the lessor after lessor terminated the lease because of lessee’s failure to pay the rent due.
The appellee cites the case of Trustees of First Presbyterian Church in Newark v. Howard Co. — Jewelers, 19 N.J.Super. 168 , 88 A.2d 33 (1952) in support of the lower court’s final decree in which it was declared that the unearned portion of the real estate broker’s commission was an item of damages. The decision of the Superior Court of New Jersey, supra, was reversed on appeal on other grounds and, therefore, the issue presented herein was not passed upon on appeal.
The weight of authority in the United States is that a broker’s commission is not an element of recoverable damage in a case based upon breach of contract as the commission was not incurred in performing the contract, but in procuring it. Manning v. Pounds, 2 Conn.Cir. 344, 199 A.2d 188 (1963); Linde v. Ellis, 224 Ky. 649 , 6 S.W.2d 1089 (1928); Hubbard v. Epworth, 69 Mich. 92 , 36 N.W. 801 (1888); Wilhelm Lubrication Co. v. Brattrud, 197 Minn. 626 , 268 N.W. 634 , 106 A.L.R. 1279 (1936); Empire Realty Corp. v, Sayre, 107 App.Div. 415 , 95 N.Y.S. 371 (1905); Steers v. Laird, 3 Mise. 408, 23 N.Y.S. 158 (1893); Ellingsworth v. Shannon, 161 Or. 106 , 88 P.2d 293 (1939) ; Platts v. Arney, 50 Wash. 2d 42 , 309 P.2d 372 (1957). Therefore, the decree appealed is reversed.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings relating to the question of damages not inconsistent with this opinion.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.