Marco Antonio Gonzales-Neyra v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Marco Antonio GONZALES-NEYRA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Opinion
ORDER The opinion filed on September 15, 1997 [ 122 F.3d 1293 ] is amended as follows:
The sentence at page 12060, lines 9-13 [ 122 F.3d at 1296 ], which reads:
“Because we conclude that Gonzales-Neyra established past persecution on account of his political opinion, we also hold that he was entitled to a rebuttable presumption that he had a well-founded fear that he would be similarly persecuted in the future.”
is replaced by:
“Regardless of whether Gonzales-Neyra established past persecution on account of his political opinion, he established a well-founded fear of future persecution.”
The Petition for Rehearing is denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(petitioner persecuted on account of his political opinion when subjected to extortion by guerilla organization requiring him to pay them every month or risk harassment and closure of his business)
Cited by 14 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Teresita Moral BORJA v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
- Liri Norek Marku v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Abbas Zahedi v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Benito Eusebio Chanchavac v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Alireza Rabie Jahed Maryam Feizi Labon Rabie Jahed Tansagol Rabie Jahed v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Teresita Moral BORJA v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.