TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ocala Star-Banner Co. v. Damron

OCALA STAR-BANNER COMPANY, a Florida corporation, and Loyal Phillips, individually v. Leonard DAMRON

Ocala Star-Banner Co. v. Damron, 231 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Subsequent history: rev'd, Ocala Star-Banner Co. v. Damron, 401 U.S. 295 (1971). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 21, 1970
Docket
No. 38658
Judges
Adkins, Boyd, Drew, Ervin, Roberts
Citations
231 So. 2d 8221970 Fla. LEXIS 2867

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

Review having been sought by direct appeal from the District Court of Appeal, *823 First District, and argument having been heard and the record having been examined, it is our opinion and we hold that the cause sub judice is not within the orbit of the jurisdiction of this court as set forth by Section 4(2), Article V, Constitution • of Florida, F.S.A. Therefore the cause is dismissed ex mero motu.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1971: 21982: 11992: 119712026peak 1971 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ocala Star-Banner Co. v. Damron401 U.S. 295 (1971)
  2. Charles J. Bufalino, Jr. v. The Associated Press692 F.2d 266 (2d Cir. 1982)
  3. Hinerman v. Daily Gazette Co., Inc.423 S.E.2d 560 (W. Va. 1992)
  4. Damron v. Ocala Star-Banner35 Fla. Supp. 137 (Fla. Cir. Ct., Marion Cty. 1971)

Most recent

  1. Hinerman v. Daily Gazette Co., Inc.423 S.E.2d 560 (W. Va. 1992)
  2. Charles J. Bufalino, Jr. v. The Associated Press692 F.2d 266 (2d Cir. 1982)
  3. Damron v. Ocala Star-Banner35 Fla. Supp. 137 (Fla. Cir. Ct., Marion Cty. 1971)
  4. Ocala Star-Banner Co. v. Damron401 U.S. 295 (1971)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list