TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Board of Public Instruction v. McQuiston

The BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DADE COUNTY, Florida v. Margaret McQUISTON

Bd. of Pub. Instruction v. McQuiston, 233 So. 2d 168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 24, 1970
Docket
No. 69-727
Judges
Bark, Dull, Hendry, Pearson
Citations
233 So. 2d 1681970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6635

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee was a non-instructional employee of the appellant. She was discharged for failure to comply with regulations regarding her employment. She contends she had a right to appeal to a committee, which hearing should have been conducted in a quasi-judicial fashion. She took an appeal; the committee recommended her dismissal, which recommendation was approved by The Board of Public In *169 struction. She then took certiorari to the circuit court and prevailed upon the circuit court to quash the order of the Board and to order a rehearing. The Board then appealed the circuit judge’s ruling to this certiorari proceeding, and (2) that the court, contending (1) that the circuit court was without jurisdiction to entertain the proceedings resulting in the dismissal of the appellee were executive actions and not those of the Board or its employees in a quasi-judicial fashion.

We find that the circuit court erred in two respects: First, it did not have jurisdiction to entertain the petition for certiorari. Adams v. Board of Public Instruction of Okaloosa County, Fla.App. 1969, 225 So.2d 423 ; Powell v. Board of Public Instruction of Levy County, Fla. App.1969, 229 So.2d 308 . 1 Further, even if the circuit court had jurisdiction it erred in construing the proceedings for dismissal of the employee as a quasi-judicial administrative action, when it is apparent that the action of the Board in discharging a non-instructional employee [not protected by classified service] was an executive action not reviewable by certiorari, cf. DeGroot v. Sheffield, Fla.1957, 95 So.2d 912 ; Bloomfield v. Mayo, Fla.App.1960, 119 So.2d 417 ; Modlin v. City of Miami Beach, Fla. 1967, 201 So.2d 70 ; § 230.23(5) (h), Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

Therefore, for the reasons above stated, the final order of the circuit court, here under review, be and the same is hereby set aside and reversed with directions to dismiss the petition for certiorari filed in the trial court.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

. It is recognized that these decisions catne down after the circuit judge took jurisdiction of the matter, but causes are determined at the appellate level as the law exists at the time of the appeal and not at the time of the institution of the proceedings in the trial court. Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Rouse, Fla.1966, 194 So.2d 260 ; Personnel Board of City of Miami Beach v. Majewski, Fla.App. 1969, 227 So.2d 498 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 11974: 11976: 12000: 119722026peak 1972 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Von Stephens v. School Bd. of Sarasota County338 So. 2d 890 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
  2. Morris v. State261 So. 2d 563 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
  3. Vazquez v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF HOMESTEAD774 So. 2d 813 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
  4. Mt. Sinai Hospital of Greater Miami, Inc. v. Hubbard292 So. 2d 389 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Most recent

  1. Vazquez v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF HOMESTEAD774 So. 2d 813 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
  2. Von Stephens v. School Bd. of Sarasota County338 So. 2d 890 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
  3. Mt. Sinai Hospital of Greater Miami, Inc. v. Hubbard292 So. 2d 389 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)
  4. Morris v. State261 So. 2d 563 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 7

DepthCaseCited by
De Groot v. Sheffield, 95 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 1957) 359
Fla. East Coast Ry. Co. v. Rouse, 194 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1967) 97
Modlin v. City of Miami Beach, 201 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 1967) 95
Bloomfield v. Mayo, 119 So. 2d 417 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960) 51
Powell v. Bd. of Pub. Instruction of Levy CTY., 229 So. 2d 308 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969) 24
Adams v. Bd. of Pub. Instruction of Okaloosa Cnty., 225 So. 2d 423 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969) 10
Pers. Bd. of Miami Beach v. Majewski, 227 So. 2d 498 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list