State v. Washington
STATE of Louisiana v. Evariste V. WASHINGTON
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
In re: Evariste V. Washington applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas ‘Corpus.
Writ granted. The trial judge is ordered to reopen the bail hearing held May 4, 1972, and to permit the defendant to interrogate Deputy Sheriff Richard Rodriguez to determine if he has any information that corroborates defendant’s alibi, that is, that he was not present when the crime was committed or is not answerable therefor.
Because of the condition of the victim, or the possible effect of such interrogation on her, the trial judge may exercise his own discretion as to whether or not she may be called as a witness.
The trial judge is authorized to restrict the interrogation so it will not be used for general exploratory or discovery purposes, but only for the production of affirmative evidence of innocence of the defendant under his assertion that he was not present when the crime was committed.
After reception of the additional evidence, the trial judge will rule upon the bail application.
Concurrence
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
HAMLIN, J.,
is of the opinion that the ruling of the trial judge is correct. He has not abused his discretion.
Concurrence
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
SUMMERS, J.,
is also of the opinion that the ruling of the trial judge is correct. The reasons assigned for granting this writ without hearing in this unclear area of the law can only serve to further obscure the proper guidelines to which a trial judge must adhere.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.