TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jimenez v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Reinaldo G. JIMENEZ v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Jimenez v. Liberty Mut. Ins., 270 So. 2d 406 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 12, 1972
Docket
No. 72-375
Judges
Barkdull, Carroll, Field, Haver
Citations
270 So. 2d 406

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

In an action to recover insurance proceeds plaintiff-appellant, Reinaldo G. Jimenez, seeks review of an adverse summary judgment.

On January 1, 1970 an automobile accident occurred in which appellant was injured due to the alleged negligence of a Mr. Winkfield. At the time of the accident appellant had uninsured motorist coverage with appellee, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and Winkfield had liability insurance with First American Insurance Company which was later adjudicated insolvent on February 23, 1971 (see O’Malley v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Fla.1971, 257 So.2d 9 ). From the record on appeal it appears that the tort-feasor’s insurer became insolvent more than one year after the accident; therefore, the judgment should be affirmed. Insurance Company of North America v. Strauss, Fla.App. 1970, 231 So.2d 548 ; Bartholomew v. Glens Falls Insurance Group, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 698 ; F.S. § 627.727(3), F.S.A.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1976: 219762026peak 1976 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Mirth333 So. 2d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
  2. Johnson v. Government Employees Ins. Co.333 So. 2d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Most recent

  1. Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Mirth333 So. 2d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
  2. Johnson v. Government Employees Ins. Co.333 So. 2d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
O'Malley v. Fla. Ins. Guar. Ass'n, 257 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1971) 47
Ins. Co. of North Am. v. Strauss, 231 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970) 9
Bartholomew v. Glens Falls Ins. Group, 241 So. 2d 698 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list