James v. State
Ronnie JAMES v. STATE of Florida
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
This court has carefully considered the record and the briefs of counsel and, on the authority of North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970), we find that the trial court properly accepted the defendant’s plea of guilty. See also Estes v. State, Fla.App. (1st) 1974, 294 So.2d 122 . Accordingly, the judgment appealed is
Affirmed.
RAWLS, C. J., and BOYER, J., concur. McCORD, J., concurring specially.
Concurrence
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
McCORD, Judge
(concurring specially).
From the record it is clear that appellant’s plea of guilty to the charge of aggravated assault in this cause was the result of a negotiated plea wherein the state nolle prossed two additional cases against defendant, each charging breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and grand larceny. I agree with affirmance on authority of Estes v. State cited in main opinion.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.