Mosby & Russell Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Hudson Co.
MOSBY & RUSSELL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. v. HUDSON COMPANY OF FLORIDA and Shell Oil Company
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion of appellant-third party defendant to dismiss on the grounds of improper venue. See, Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Linder Industrial Machinery Company, Fla.App.1972, 263 So.2d 237 ; United States v. Acord, 10 Cir. 1954, 209 F.2d 709 , cert. denied, 347 U.S. 975 , 74 S.Ct. 786 , 98 L.Ed. 1115 ; McGrath v. Lund’s Fisheries, D.Del.1959, 170 F. Supp. 173 ; 6 Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, Section 1445 (1971); 3 Moore, Federal Practice, Section 14.28(2), (2nd ed. 1974).
Affirmed.
OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.