City of Stuart v. McMullian
CITY OF STUART, a political subdivision v. A. J. McMULLIAN, III, Director, Division of Employment Security, State of Florida Department of Commerce
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
The primary issue posed by petitioner is that Section 443.07(5)(b), 1 Fla.Stat., explicit *1210 ly prohibits respondent from charging petitioner for unemployment compensation benefits erroneously paid by respondent and finally reversed and disqualified by an appeals referee. Baptist Baptist Hospital, Inc. v. White 2 is decisive of the issue involved in this cause and requires reversal.
REVERSED.
BOYER, C. J., RAWLS, J., and MCDONALD, PARKER LEE, Associate Judge, concur.
. Sec. 443.07(5)(b), Fla.Stat., provides in part: “. . If a determination allowing benefits is affirmed in any amount by an appeals referee, or is so affirmed by the commission or if a decision of an appeals referee, allowing benefits is affirmed in any amount by the *1210 commission, such benefits shall be promptly paid regardless of any further appeal, and no injunction, supersedeas, stay, or other writ or process suspending the payment of such benefits shall be issued bv any court, but if such decision is finally reversed, no employer’s account shall be charged with benefits so paid pursuant to the erroneous determination and benefits shall not be paid for any subsequent weeks of unemployment involved in such reversal.” (emphasis supplied)
. Baptist Hospital, Inc. v. White, 313 So.2d 106 (1 Fla.App.1975).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.