TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Tamburro v. State

Angelo Louis TAMBURRO v. STATE of Florida

Tamburro v. State, 343 So. 2d 638 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 18, 1977
Docket
No. 75-2166
Judges
Alan, Dauksch, Letts, Schwartz
Citations
343 So. 2d 6381977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15086

Opinion of the Court — Schwartzalan

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge.

Distinguishing Brown v. State, 313 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975) and Brown v. State, 330 So.2d 861 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976) on their facts, we hold that the totality of the circumstances presented to the arresting police officer, including the “spacy” condition of the defendant after he was stopped for a traffic violation, the odor of marijuana, and the apparent “roach” which was seen in plain view in his car, was such as to create probable cause to believe that the defendant had committed the offense of possession of cannabis. Clark v. State, 322 So.2d 635 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1975); State v. Daniel, 319 So.2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); State v. Flores, 305 So.2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); Lavazzoli v. State, 281 So.2d 519 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1973). Hence, both the defendant’s *639 arrest and the subsequent search of his vehicle were valid. The trial court therefore properly denied the motion to suppress the sawed-off shot gun which was secured as a result of that search.

We likewise find no merit in the contention that the appellant’s nolo plea was improperly accepted by the trial court. Stovall v. State, 252 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

Affirmed.

DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1978: 11981: 11987: 11988: 119782026peak 1978 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Caplan v. State531 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 1988)
  2. State v. Melendez392 So. 2d 587 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
  3. Romanello v. State365 So. 2d 220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
  4. Caplan v. State515 So. 2d 1362 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Most recent

  1. Caplan v. State531 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 1988)
  2. Caplan v. State515 So. 2d 1362 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
  3. State v. Melendez392 So. 2d 587 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
  4. Romanello v. State365 So. 2d 220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 7

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Flores, 305 So. 2d 292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974) 15
Stovall v. State, 252 So. 2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971) 13
Brown v. State, 330 So. 2d 861 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976) 9
State v. Daniel, 319 So. 2d 582 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975) 6
Brown v. State, 313 So. 2d 52 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975) 3
Clark v. State, 322 So. 2d 635 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975) 3
Lavazzoli v. State, 281 So. 2d 519 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list