Fleming v. Romero
Arthur H. FLEMING v. John J. ROMERO
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
In re: Arthur H. Fleming applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, 342 So.2d 881 , Third Circuit Parish of Iberia.
Application denied; the result is correct.
SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., are of the opinion that a writ should be granted.
Dissent
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
TATE, J.,
dissents from the denial of the
writ: I am of the opinion that the defendant’s agreement to sell was timely accepted in writing by the plaintiff’s attorney (as well as the defendant’s acceptance of a deposit), for the reasons stated by the trial court.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.