Greater Baton Rouge Airport District v. Hays

GREATER BATON ROUGE AIRPORT DISTRICT v. Mrs. Florence Hobgood HAYS

Greater Baton Rouge Airport Dist. v. Hays, 345 So. 2d 66 (La. Ct. App. 1976)

Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal · State Appellate Courts
Decided: June 30, 1976
Docket: No. 10908
Judges: Chiasson, Edwards, Sartain
Citations: 345 So. 2d 661976 La. App. LEXIS 4035

Cited by 4

Opinion of the Court — Chiasson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

CHIASSON, Judge.

The Parish of East Baton Rouge, the Greater Baton Rouge Airport District, Bertrand Roussel, Director of Finance of the Parish of East Baton Rouge, and Francis J. Fitch, Treasurer of the Greater Baton Rouge Airport District, filed a petition for Writs of Prohibition, Certiorari, Mandamus and Review in this Court seeking to have this Court direct the Honorable Judge Luther F. Cole, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, State of Louisiana, to reverse his ruling and judgment of April 26, 1976, making peremptory the Writ of Mandamus ordering Bertrand Roussel and Francis J. Fitch to pay the sum of $85,385.00 to defendants, Mrs. Florence H. Hays, Edward Chase Hobgood, John Pugh Hobgood and Bill Arp Hobgood, in part payment of a judgment previously rendered in the amount of $198,753.00 in an expropriation suit.

Before considering the merits of the application, we note that petitioners have a right to a suspensive appeal. CCP Article 2123. Rosteet v. City of Lake Charles, La.App., 215 So.2d 668 .

The supervisory jurisdiction of the Appellate Courts may not be invoked except in those cases where irreparable injury will otherwise result, or appeal affords an inadequate remedy. No such showing has been made in this case.

We, therefore, hold that petitioners have an adequate remedy by suspensive appeal. For these reasons, the Writs previously issued by this Court are recalled and vacated. All costs pertaining to this application, to the extent permitted by law, are assessed against relators. All other costs are to await a final determination on the merits.

WRITS RECALLED AND VACATED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Women's Clinic v. Watson550 So. 2d 864 (La. Ct. App. 1989)
Chambers v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.383 So. 2d 46 (La. Ct. App. 1980)
Felix v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.471 So. 2d 963 (La. Ct. App. 1985)
Greater Baton Rouge Airport District v. Hays345 So. 2d 897 (La. 1977)

Most recent

Women's Clinic v. Watson550 So. 2d 864 (La. Ct. App. 1989)
Felix v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.471 So. 2d 963 (La. Ct. App. 1985)
Chambers v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.383 So. 2d 46 (La. Ct. App. 1980)
Greater Baton Rouge Airport District v. Hays345 So. 2d 897 (La. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Rosteet v. City of Lake Charles, 215 So. 2d 668 (La. Ct. App. 1968)	4

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list