TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Deutsch v. Deutsch

Samuel Paul DEUTSCH v. Elaine Simpson DEUTSCH

Deutsch v. Deutsch, 349 So. 2d 725 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
August 23, 1977
Docket
No. 76-1973
Judges
Alderman, Letts, Marvin, Mounts
Citations
349 So. 2d 7251977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16262

Opinion of the Court — Mountsmarvin

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

MOUNTS, MARVIN U.,

Associate Judge.

The appellant, former husband of the petitioner, appeals an order committing him for contempt for the failure to pay his former wife an alimony arrearage.

The trial court announced during the hearing, almost in the same breath that it found him in contempt, that the court would also have to reduce his alimony payments on a temporary basis:

“THE COURT: I will give him 30 days to make the $2,400 back alimony payments. And in the event he does not do so, he will serve a term of 30 days in jail.

MR. PATTERSON: I will draw up the order.

THE COURT: As to the reduction, I am going to have to take into consideration the testimony, which is not refuted, that he can’t make payments at this time because of his problems; and I will have to reduce his alimony on a temporary basis.”

The trial court made no finding, now clearly required by the law, that the appellant presently had the ability to comply with the order and was willfully refusing to do so or that the petitioner previously had the ability to comply, but divested himself of that ability through his fault or neglect designed to frustrate the intent and purpose of the order.

Accordingly, the order of the trial court is quashed and the cause remanded with directions to make the required finding, if supported by the record, or otherwise vacate the order of contempt. Garó v. Garo, 347 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1977), Faircloth v. Fair-cloth, 339 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1976).

QUASHED and REMANDED with directions.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and LETTS, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1979: 11983: 119792026peak 1979 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Sokol v. Sokol441 So. 2d 682 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
  2. Deutsch v. Deutsch368 So. 2d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Most recent

  1. Sokol v. Sokol441 So. 2d 682 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
  2. Deutsch v. Deutsch368 So. 2d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Faircloth v. Faircloth, 339 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 1976) 91
Garo v. Garo, 347 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1977) 13

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list