Tyner v. State
Bradford TYNER v. STATE of Florida
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
Appeal from a denial of a motion to vacate a judgment and sentence, pursuant to Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P. Appellant contends that a substitute judge sentenced him without becoming familiar with the case and that, therefore, the sentence is invalid.
This issue could have been raised on direct appeal and, thus, cannot be raised with a motion to vacate or set aside a judgment and conviction. Von Eberstein v. State, 270 So.2d 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972). Accordingly, the order of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.