Tapper v. Taunton
George G. TAPPER v. David L. TAUNTON
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
George Tapper appeals from a final order of dismissal for lack of prosecution. A dismissal for lack of prosecution is not an adjudication on the merits and does not bar subsequent action on the same subject matter, Hassenteufel v. Howard Johnson, Inc., of Florida, 53 So.2d 810 (Fla.1951); thus the words “with prejudice” are surplusage and are hereby stricken from the final order.
The action of the trial court is AFFIRMED in all other respects.
MILLS, Acting C. J., and ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr. and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
("A dismissal for lack of prosecution is not an adjudication on the merits and does not bar subsequent action on the same subject matter . . . .")
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.