Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Elaine REEVES v. The GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
In re Elaine Reeves and John Reeves, applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Rapides. No. 6895. La.App., 370 So.2d 202 .
Denied.
Dissent
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
TATE, J.,
would grant on Assignment 5. The commercial retailer should be held to know the defects just as the manufacturer is. See dissent in Spillers v. Montgomery Ward, 294 So.2d 803 (La.1974).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.