Rawls v. Damare
James H. RAWLS v. Harry DAMARE
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
In re James H. Rawls, applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 377 So.2d 1376 .
Denied.
DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
Dissent
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
DIXON, J.,
is of the opinion the court of appeal was in error and would grant. Any *73 “party” may be called on cross-examination at trial; this right is not dependent on service on the “party” CCP 1634. Further, the case probably should have been reopened.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.