TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Insurance Co. of North America v. Electric Power & Service, Inc.

INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, a Pennsylvania Corp. v. ELECTRIC POWER & SERVICE, INC., a Florida Corporation

Ins. Co. of North Am. v. Elec. Power & Serv., Inc., 384 So. 2d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 10, 1980
Docket
No. 79-1600
Judges
Barkdull, Hubbart, Schwartz
Citations
384 So. 2d 9151980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16909

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

The final order under review, which awards attorneys fees for the plaintiff subcontractor [Electric Power & Service, Inc.] in its suit against the contractor [Scope Construction Company] and its surety insurer [Insurance Company of North America] under the subject contractor’s performance bond, is reversed upon a holding that no final judgment on the merits was rendered by the trial court in the plaintiff’s favor, [the lawsuit was, in fact, settled between the parties] and, under the applicable law, the absence of such a final judgment precludes the award of attorneys fees herein under Sections 627.756, 627.428(1), Florida Statutes (1979). American Home Assurance Co. v. Keller Industries, 347 So.2d 767 (Fla.3d DCA 1977). Upon this reversal, the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to vacate the order under review and deny the application for attorneys fees.

Reversed and remanded.

Concurrence — Schwartz

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

SCHWARTZ, Judge

(specially concurring).

I agree that reversal is required by our decision in American Home Assurance Co. v. Keller Industries, Inc., 347 So.2d 767 (Fla.3d DCA 1977), cert. denied, dismissed, 360 So.2d 1249 (Fla.1978), 367 So.2d 1124 (Fla.1979). Were the issue an original one in this district, however, I would follow the contrary views well-expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Hendry in Keller and in the conflicting cases of Gibson v. Walker, 380 So.2d 531 (Fla.5th DCA 1980) and Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Palmer, 297 So.2d 96 (Fla.4th DCA 1974).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1980: 11983: 119802026peak 1980 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. City of Jacksonville ex rel. Interform, Inc. v. Orr Construction Co.427 So. 2d 237 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Ware391 So. 2d 331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Most recent

  1. City of Jacksonville ex rel. Interform, Inc. v. Orr Construction Co.427 So. 2d 237 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Ware391 So. 2d 331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Palmer, 297 So. 2d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974) 52
Am. Home Assur. Co. v. Keller Indus., 347 So. 2d 767 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977) 24
Gibson v. Walker, 380 So. 2d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980) 20

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list