TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Florida Bar v. Collier

THE FLORIDA BAR v. James C. COLLIER

Fla. Bar v. Collier, 385 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 1980)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 19, 1980
Docket
No. 58764
Judges
Adkins, Alderman, Boyd, England, Overton
Citations
385 So. 2d 951980 Fla. LEXIS 4279

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding by The Florida Bar against James C. Collier, a member of The Florida Bar, is presently before us on complaint of The Florida Bar and Report of Referee. No petition for review has been filed.

The report of the referee indicates the respondent was extremely dilatory in the administration of an estate and failed to properly comply and respond to orders of *96 the circuit judges responsible for the probate division for Orange County.

The referee recommends the following disciplinary measures be imposed:

IV. Recommendation as to Disciplinary measures to be applied: I recommend that Respondent be (A) suspended from the practice of law for a period of 60 days with automatic reinstatement at the end of the period of suspension as provided in Rule 11.10(3); (B) placed on probation for a period of 2 years and while on probation, he report quarterly the status and progress of every probate and guardianship case being handled by him to the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar; and (C) required to pay the costs [$296.75] of this disciplinary proceeding.

We agree with the referee’s conclusion that respondent has violated disciplinary rules 1-102(A)(5), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(2), and 7-101(A)(3). Respondent is hereby disciplined consistent with the referee’s recommendation. The suspension shall be effective July 21, 1980, thereby giving respondent time to close out his practice and take the necessary steps to protect his clients, and it is ordered that respondent shall not accept any new business.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1981: 119812026peak 1981 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against Koehler628 P.2d 461 (Wash. 1981)

Most recent

  1. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against Koehler628 P.2d 461 (Wash. 1981)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list