TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Johnathan Cole v. James Purkett, Superintendent at Farmington Correctional Center

Cole v. Purkett, 155 F.3d 558 (8th Cir. 1998)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 8, 1998
Docket
No. 97-4336
Citations
155 F.3d 5581998 WL 396122

Opinion

155 F.3d 558

Johnathan COLE, Appellant, v. James Purkett, Superintendent at Farmington Correctional Center, Appellee.

No. 97-4336.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 15, 1998. Decided July 8, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Johnathan Cole appeals the district court's 1 denial of his pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He claims that the prosecution's evidence in his state trial was so constitutionally insufficient as to deny him due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment. Specifically, Cole argues that the testimony of four police officers who claim to have seen him in possession of cocaine is inconsistent with a videotape of the drug transaction and Cole's subsequent arrest. The inconsistency, argues Cole, resulted in a verdict unsupported by substantial evidence. The district court held that the officers' credibility and inconsistencies in the testimony were questions for the jury and did not go to the submissibility of the state's case. After carefully reviewing the entire record, including the videotape, 2 the trial transcripts, and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the judgment of the district court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Terry I. Adelman, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri 2

We grant Cole's motion to supplement the record with a copy of the videotape admitted into evidence at his trial

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 26 cases

View all citing references →
1998: 21999: 62000: 12001: 12002: 12003: 12004: 22005: 32006: 32007: 12014: 12017: 12020: 12021: 219982026peak 1999 · 6

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mohan v. Norris871 A.2d 575 (Md. 2005)
  2. Estate of Fennell ex rel. Fennell v. Stephenson528 S.E.2d 911 (N.C. Ct. App. 2000)
  3. Allen v. Michelin North American IncNo. 6:18-cv-00791 (D.S.C. Dec. 14, 2020)
  4. Hagelin v. CaudillNo. 7:21-cv-00077 (W.D. Va. July 15, 2021)
  5. Estate of Fennell ex rel. Fennell v. Stephenson554 S.E.2d 629 (N.C. 2001)
  6. People ex rel. S.G.91 P.3d 443 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004)

Most recent

  1. Hagelin v. CaudillNo. 7:21-cv-00077 (W.D. Va. July 15, 2021)
  2. Black v. Buffalo Meat Service, Inc. d/b/a Boulevard Black AngusNo. 1:15-cv-00049 (W.D.N.Y. May 21, 2021)
  3. Allen v. Michelin North American IncNo. 6:18-cv-00791 (D.S.C. Dec. 14, 2020)
  4. Eilber v. Floor Care Specialists, Inc.807 S.E.2d 219 (Va. 2017)
  5. Reyazuddin v. Montgomery County7 F. Supp. 3d 526 (D. Maryland 2014)
  6. Farah v. Comm'r2007 T.C. Memo. 369

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list