U.S. ex rel. Aflatooni v. Kitsap Physicians Services
United States of America, Ex Rel. Alfred Aflatooni v. Kitsap Physicians Services, a Non-Profit Washington Corporation Northwest Diagnostic Imaging, Inc., a Washington Professional Services Corporation Pathology Associates of Kitsap County, a Washington Partnership Ronald Reimer, Md and Susan L. Reimer, His Wife Paul S. McCullough Md, and Jane Doe McCullough His Wife Robert C. Schneidler and Sharon K. Schneidler, His Wife Nancy Koch and Richard L. Koch, Her Husband Keith Hallman, Md and Kathleen Hallman, His Wife John P. Matan, Md and Susan J. Matan, His Wife Thomas C. Case, Md and Mary Ann Case, His Wife Milton S. Michaelis, Md and Jane Doe Michaelis, His Wife and Johns Doe and Janes Doe, 1-200
Opinion
158 F.3d 439w 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7335
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. ALFRED AFLATOONI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. KITSAP PHYSICIANS SERVICES, A NON-PROFIT WASHINGTON CORPORATION; NORTHWEST DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, INC., A WASHINGTON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION; PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF KITSAP COUNTY, A WASHINGTON PARTNERSHIP; RONALD REIMER, MD AND SUSAN L. REIMER, HIS WIFE; PAUL S. MCCULLOUGH, MD, AND JANE DOE MCCULLOUGH, HIS WIFE; ROBERT C. SCHNEIDLER AND SHARON K. SCHNEIDLER, HIS WIFE; NANCY KOCH AND RICHARD L. KOCH, HER HUSBAND; KEITH HALLMAN, MD AND KATHLEEN HALLMAN, HIS WIFE; JOHN P. MATAN, MD AND SUSAN J. MATAN, HIS WIFE; THOMAS C. CASE, MD AND MARY ANN CASE, HIS WIFE; MILTON S. MICHAELIS, MD AND JANE DOE MICHAELIS, HIS WIFE; AND DEFENDANTS JOHNS DOE AND JANES DOE, 1-200, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.
No. 97-35395.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted July 10, 1998. Decided Sept. 22, 1998.
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.