Matthews v. State
Raymond A. MATTHEWS v. STATE of Florida
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, but the case is remanded for resen-tencing. The sentence incorrectly failed to provide the period of credit time to be allowed appellant as required by section 921.-161(1), Florida Statutes (1979). Shemwell v. State, 391 So.2d 218 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). Appellant need not be present at resentenc-ing.
HOBSON, A.C.J., and BOARDMAN and OTT, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.