TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Taylor v. United States

Eddie Willie Taylor, Michael F.X. Hogan v. United States of America, Intervenor-Appellant, and State of Arizona Terry Stewart, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections

Taylor v. United States, 158 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 1998)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 3, 1998
Docket
No. 97-16069
Citations
158 F.3d 105998 Daily Journal DAR 113561998 WL 77524598 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 83021998 U.S. App. LEXIS 28184

Opinion

158 F.3d 1059

Eddie Willie TAYLOR, Michael F.X. Hogan, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Intervenor-Appellant, and State of Arizona; Terry Stewart, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 97-16069, 97-16071.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 3, 1998.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge.ORDER 1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Taylor v. United States, 143 F.3d 1178 (9th Cir.1998) is withdrawn.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1999: 42001: 119992026peak 1999 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. James Benjamin v. Michael Jacobson, Commissioner of the Department of Correction of the City of New York172 F.3d 144 (2d Cir. 1999)
  2. Nichols v. Hopper173 F.3d 820 (11th Cir. 1999)
  3. Taylor v. United States181 F.3d 1017 (9th Cir. 1999)
  4. Hart v. Arpaio2 F. App'x 867 (9th Cir. 2001)
  5. Nichols v. Haley173 F.3d 820 (11th Cir. 1999)

Most recent

  1. Hart v. Arpaio2 F. App'x 867 (9th Cir. 2001)
  2. Taylor v. United States181 F.3d 1017 (9th Cir. 1999)
  3. Nichols v. Hopper173 F.3d 820 (11th Cir. 1999)
  4. Nichols v. Haley173 F.3d 820 (11th Cir. 1999)
  5. James Benjamin v. Michael Jacobson, Commissioner of the Department of Correction of the City of New York172 F.3d 144 (2d Cir. 1999)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Taylor v. United States, 143 F.3d 1178 (9th Cir. 1998) 22

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list