TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sample v. Sample

Barbara Suzanne SAMPLE v. John Henry SAMPLE

Sample v. Sample, 423 So. 2d 106 (La. Ct. App. 1982)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 16, 1982
Docket
No. 82 CA 0468
Judges
Ellis, Ponder, Savoie
Citations
423 So. 2d 1061982 La. App. LEXIS 8493

Opinion of the Court — Ponder

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PONDER, Judge.

This is before us on a motion to dismiss an appeal on the basis that the parties stipulated to the judgment.

It arose under the following circumstances.

In 1981 plaintiff secured a judgment of separation. The parties stipulated that the judgment should contain mutual injunctions prohibiting the parties from alienating or encumbering any community property prior to voluntary settlement or judicial partition of the property. After a motion by defendant to terminate the injunction in March, 1982 was denied, the mutual injunctions were maintained in a judgment of divorce granted in April, 1982. In addition to the divorce and the injunctions, this judgment contained the grant of custody of the minor children, rights of visitation, and the termination of alimony pendente lite granted previously to the defendant.

Defendant was granted a suspensive appeal and furnished bond for it. Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the basis that defendant stipulated to the mutual injunctions. Defendant asserts that the stipulation applied only to the judgment of separation, the effect of which was ended by the judgment of divorce, that the stipulation applied only to the preliminary injunction of the judgment of separation and not to the permanent injunction of the judgment of divorce.

The arguments presented to the court are beside the point.

*107 The stipulation was that the injunctions were to be effective until voluntary settlement or judicial partition of the community property. These conditions have not occurred.

Also, the Supreme Court in Davis v. Davis, 420 So.2d 432 (La.1982), held that:

“An injunction obtained by a party to a suit for separation or divorce continues until: (1) there is a court order; or (2) the necessity abates because the community property has been inventoried and/or partitioned.”

However, the judgment has provisions other than the injunctions, and these provisions are appealable.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1983: 119832026peak 1983 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Sample v. Sample432 So. 2d 376 (La. Ct. App. 1983)

Most recent

  1. Sample v. Sample432 So. 2d 376 (La. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Davis v. Davis, 420 So. 2d 432 (La. 1982) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list