TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Puritan Insurance Co. v. Frank

PURITAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation v. Walter L. FRANK

Puritan Ins. Co. v. Frank, 436 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 27, 1983
Docket
No. 82-2464
Judges
Nesbitt, Pearson, Schwartz
Citations
436 So. 2d 11401983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22830

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

Although Dr. Frank carried his burden of demonstrating his entitlement to coverage under an all risk policy, he nonetheless failed to negate the existence of genuine issues of fact with respect to the insurer’s affirmative defenses of: (a) conversion; and (b) geographical areas of coverage. For this reason, the summary final judgment on coverage is reversed and remanded for further proceedings. Hamilton v. Bank of Palm Beach and Trust Co., 348 So.2d 1190 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

That portion of the summary judgment determining non-subrogation is vacated to abide the final resolution of the identical problem presently pending in the federal court system. See Wade v. Clower, 94 Fla. 817 , 114 So. 548 (1927).

Reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1984: 11991: 12006: 119842026peak 1984 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. SAC Const. Co. v. EAGLE NAT. BANK OF MIAMI449 So. 2d 301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
  2. United National Insurance Co. v. I & JC Corp.927 So. 2d 167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
  3. Estate of Bacon v. Bacon573 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Most recent

  1. United National Insurance Co. v. I & JC Corp.927 So. 2d 167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
  2. Estate of Bacon v. Bacon573 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
  3. SAC Const. Co. v. EAGLE NAT. BANK OF MIAMI449 So. 2d 301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Wade v. Clower, 114 So. 548 (Fla. 1927) 75
Hamilton v. Bank of Palm Beach & Trust Co., 348 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list