Landry v. Aetna Insurance Co.
Henry LANDRY, Sr. v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY Lonnie LANDRY v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
In Re: Henry Landry, Sr. and Lonnie Landry, applying for Writ of Certiorari or Review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 12593; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, No. 78-648.
Case Below: 438 So.2d 628 .
Granted. Reversed and remanded to the court of appeal to reconsider. The “law of the case” doctrine is a “discretionary guide” and has no application when an appellate court reviews a ruling of the district court or when there is palpable error in a prior ruling. See CCP 2164, comment (a), and Petition of Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, La., 278 So.2d 81 .
MARCUS and WATSON, JJ., would deny and dissent from the order.
Concurrence
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
LEMMON, J.,
concurs with reasons. Our inadvertent denial of certiorari on the issue of Lonnie Landry’s negligence in the consolidated case causes complications in the present case. However, the fact that the judgment in the consolidated ease is now definitive does not preclude an independent determination of Lonnie Landry’s demands in this case.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 11 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.