Crosby v. Crosby
Vinton J. CROSBY v. Lois Pitre CROSBY
On Rehearing
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
*1249 ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING PER CURIAM.
Our original opinion is reported at 434 So.2d 162 . Subsequently, we granted a rehearing and heard oral arguments.
While the merits of the rehearing were under advisement, the following joint motion was filed by the parties:
“It is stipulated by and between the plaintiff and defendant that this suit has been compromised and settled and the parties move it be dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay its own respective costs.”
Accordingly, a ruling on the rehearing is moot and will not be forthcoming.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.