Frazier v. State
Allen L. FRAZIER v. STATE of Florida
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a sentence as an habitual offender. See § 775.084(l)(a)2, Fla.Stat. 1 Because the “prior felony” relied upon by the judge in enhancing appellant’s sentence was not yet final, it was improper to enhance the punishment. Joyner v. State, 158 Fla. 806 , 30 So.2d 304 (1947); Garrett v. State, 335 So.2d 876 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Ward v. State, 332 So.2d 698 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Coleman v. State, 281 So.2d 226 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973); See also Ruffin v. State, 397 So.2d 277 (Fla.1981).
The sentence is vacated and this cause remanded for resentencing.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.
. § 775.084(l)(a)2, Fla.Stat., states:
The felony for which the defendant is to be sentenced was committed within 5 years of the date of the conviction of the last prior felony, misdemeanor, or other qualified offense of which he was convicted, or within 5 years of the defendant s release, on parole or otherwise, from a prison sentence or other' commitment imposed as a result of a prior conviction for a felony or other qualified offense, whichever is later.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(error to sentence as a habitual offender where “pri- or felony” relied on by judge in enhancing sentence is not final)
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.