TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Estes v. Rockinson

Henry ESTES and Cleo Estes, his wife v. Frances E. ROCKINSON

Estes v. Rockinson, 461 So. 2d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 17, 1984
Docket
No. AZ-178
Judges
Barfield, Smith, Zehmer
Citations
461 So. 2d 9899 Fla. L. Weekly 26391984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16268

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment on the pleadings entered by the trial court is affirmed. In affirming the judgment, we hold that a dental hygienist, when cleaning teeth, is a provider of health care within the meaning of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1983).

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1987: 119872026peak 1987 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Shields v. Buchholz515 So. 2d 1379 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Most recent

  1. Shields v. Buchholz515 So. 2d 1379 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list