TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Long v. ABC Insurance Co.

Arlette C. LONG, Individually and John J. Long, Jr., Individually v. ABC INSURANCE COMPANY OR COMPANIES, Dr. Luis Oms, Dr. Alton Ochsner, Jr., and Montelepre, Inc. and/or Montelepre Memorial Hospital

Long v. ABC Ins. Co., 462 So. 2d 252 (La. Ct. App. 1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 19, 1984
Docket
No. CA 2737
Judges
Brano, Byrnes, Garrison
Citations
462 So. 2d 2521984 La. App. LEXIS 10280

Opinion of the Court — Garrison

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

GARRISON, Judge.

This lawsuit, filed in Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, was originally allotted to Judge Steven Plotkin. The defendant, Montelepre Memorial Hospital, filed a motion to recuse Judge Plotkin from the case. The motion was granted and signed by Judge Gerald Fedoroff and the case was ordered reallotted. The plaintiff is now appealing the ruling ordering the recusal of Judge Plotkin. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal alleging that the recusal of a judge is an interlocutory judgment which is not appealable in the absence of a showing of irreparable injury. Trial on the merits of this case has not yet taken place.

The applicable Code of Civil Procedure articles are as follows:

An appeal may be taken from a final judgment rendered in causes in which appeals are given by law whether rendered after hearing or by default, and from an interlocutory judgment which may cause irreparable injury. LSA-C. C.P. Art. 2083; and

A judgment is the determination of the rights of the parties in an action and may award any relief to which the parties are entitled. It may be interlocutory or final.

A judgment that does not determine the merits but only preliminary matters in the course of the action is an interlocutory judgment.

A judgment that determines the merits in whole or in part is a final judgment. LSA-C.C.P. Art. 1841.

According to Article 1841, the judgment ordering the recusal of Judge Plotkin is clearly interlocutory in nature. Furthermore, the plaintiff, in filing this appeal, has not made any showing of irreparable injury as required by Article 2083. Because this court lacks jurisdiction to hear this appeal, it is ordered that this appeal be dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1985: 11991: 11992: 11996: 119852026peak 1985 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Goodwin v. Goodwin607 So. 2d 8 (La. Ct. App. 1992)
  2. Deville v. Calogero673 So. 2d 1175 (La. Ct. App. 1996)
  3. In re American Waste and Pollution581 So. 2d 738 (La. Ct. App. 1991)
  4. Long v. ABC Insurance Co.463 So. 2d 604 (La. 1985)

Most recent

  1. Deville v. Calogero673 So. 2d 1175 (La. Ct. App. 1996)
  2. Goodwin v. Goodwin607 So. 2d 8 (La. Ct. App. 1992)
  3. In re American Waste and Pollution581 So. 2d 738 (La. Ct. App. 1991)
  4. Long v. ABC Insurance Co.463 So. 2d 604 (La. 1985)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list