TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Roques v. State Farm Insurance Co.

Joy Benoit ROQUES wife of/and Andre J. ROQUES, Jr. v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY and Ahren J. Knower

Roques v. State Farm Ins. Co., 469 So. 2d 254 (La. 1985)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 21, 1985
Docket
No. 85-CC-1030
Judges
Dixon, Lemmon
Citations
469 So. 2d 2541985 La. LEXIS 8685

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

IN RE: State Farm Insurance Co.; State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Stay, Supervisory, Prohibition and Mandamus; Parish of Jefferson 24th Judicial District Court Div. “N” Number 276-311; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Number 85-C-299.

Granted. The ruling of the trial judge is reversed. There was no showing of grounds for challenge for cause under C.C.P. Art. 1765. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

Concurrence — Lemmon

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

LEMMON, J.,

concurs. Nothing in this ruling prevents further voir dire to develop a basis for bias or other grounds for challenges for cause.

Dissent — Dixon

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

DIXON, C.J.,

dissents, being of the opinion that the rulings of the trial judge and court of appeal were correct. All jurors insured by the defendants are subject to challenge for cause.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1986: 11987: 119862026peak 1986 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hill v. Lamulle506 So. 2d 690 (La. Ct. App. 1987)
  2. Gagnet v. Zummo487 So. 2d 721 (La. Ct. App. 1986)

Most recent

  1. Hill v. Lamulle506 So. 2d 690 (La. Ct. App. 1987)
  2. Gagnet v. Zummo487 So. 2d 721 (La. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list