Olofson v. State
Carl OLOFSON v. STATE of Florida, Appellee STATE of Florida v. Carl OLOFSON
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur. HURLEY, J., dissents with opinion.
Dissent
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
HURLEY, Judge,
dissenting.
The trial court departed downward from the guidelines’ presumptive sentence with this justification: “Recommended sentence of HRS is felt to be adequate.” This is simply not a “clear and convincing” reason to justify departure. See Rule 3.701(b)(6), Fla.R.Crim.P.; see also Santiago v. State, 478 So.2d 47 (Fla.1985).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.