79 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1770, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,754 Julie Deffenbaugh Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
79 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1770, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,754 Julie Deffenbaugh Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Cross-Appellee
Opinion
169 F.3d 215 79 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1770 , 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,754 Julie Deffenbaugh WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., Defendants, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.
No. 97-10685.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 26, 1999.
Mark C. Brodeur, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant.
Jimmy Preston Wrotenbery, Kevin D. Jewell, Magenheim, Bateman, Robinson, Wrotenbery & Helfand, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Eldon B. Mahon, Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion Sept. 24, 1998, 5 Cir., 1998, 156 F.3d 581 ).
Before POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. *
BY THE COURT:
1
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, 2
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
* Chief Judge King is recused and did not participate in this decision
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.