TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Patterson v. State

James PATTERSON v. STATE of Florida

Patterson v. State, 506 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 8, 1987
Docket
No. 86-777
Judges
Campbell, Sanderlin, Threadgill
Citations
506 So. 2d 114312 Fla. L. Weekly 12031987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8134

Opinion of the Court — Campbell

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant, James Patterson, appeals his sentence. The trial court sentenced him to serve fifty years for second-degree murder, a concurrent term of ten years for aggravated assault and a three-year minimum mandatory sentence for each count.

The state concedes that there is no indication that a scoresheet was prepared. *1144 Neither is there any indication that the court knew what the correct presumptive sentence was. Davis v. State, 461 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). We, therefore, vacate appellant's sentences and remand for resentencing with directions that a sentencing guidelines scoresheet be prepared and considered by the trial court before the imposition of a sentence.

We would also note that any departure would have to be supported by clear and convincing reasons contained in separate written findings. Pentaude v. State, 500 So.2d 526 (Fla.1987); State v. Mischler, 488 So.2d 523 (Fla.1986). While the habitual offender status is no longer a proper reason to depart from the guidelines and its use to enhance the statutory maximum sentence is questionable (see opinion, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure Re: Sentencing Guidelines, 506 So.2d 392 (Fla. 1987) (Grimes, J., concurring); Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986)), appellant’s use of a firearm may be used to enhance the statutory maximum punishment allowed under sections 775.084 and 775.087, Florida Statutes (1985). Myers v. State, 499 So.2d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

SANDERLIN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1987: 11989: 119872026peak 1987 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hoefert v. State509 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
  2. Patterson v. State549 So. 2d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Most recent

  1. Patterson v. State549 So. 2d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
  2. Hoefert v. State509 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 6

DepthCaseCited by
Whitehead v. State, 498 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 1986) 266
State v. Mischler, 488 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 1986) 235
State v. Pentaude, 500 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 1987) 63
Davis v. State, 461 So. 2d 1361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985) 30
Myers v. State, 499 So. 2d 895 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986) 25
Hezekiah v. State, 506 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 1987) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list