TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cummins v. State

Ronald R. CUMMINS v. STATE of Florida

Cummins v. State, 519 So. 2d 718 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 4, 1988
Docket
No. 87-770
Judges
Cobb, Cowart, Sharp
Citations
519 So. 2d 71813 Fla. L. Weekly 3281988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3481988 WL 6425

Opinion of the Court — Cobb

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

COBB, Judge.

Ronald Cummins was placed on three years’ probation in October, 1985, for the offense of dealing in stolen property. 1 In November, 1986, Cummins was arrested for grand theft. 2 Cummins pled guilty to the grand theft charge and admitted the probation violation. The trial court, relying on Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(14), increased the sentence in each case to the next higher cell without written reasons for departure. This was error. The automatic one-cell departure of Rule 3.701(d)(14) only applies to the sentence imposed for the earlier offense for which probation was revoked (dealing in stolen property), not for the subsequent offense (grand theft) which constitutes the probation violation.

Accordingly, we reverse the sentence imposed in Case No. 86-7793, and remand for resentencing within the recommended guidelines range of twelve to thirty months, unless valid reasons for departure are set forth in writing.

SENTENCE REVERSED; REMANDED.

SHARP, C.J., and COWART, J., concur.

. Circuit Court Case No. 85-5160.

. Circuit Court Case No. 86-7793.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1988: 319882026peak 1988 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Peters v. State531 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 1988)
  2. Davis v. State529 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
  3. Stokes v. State529 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Most recent

  1. Peters v. State531 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 1988)
  2. Davis v. State529 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
  3. Stokes v. State529 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list