TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Universal Rehabilitation Services (Pa), Inc., Richard J. Lukesh

United States v. Universal Rehab. Servs. (Pa), Inc., 173 F.3d 914 (3d Cir. 1999)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Subsequent history: on reh'g en banc, United States v. Universal Rehab. Servs. (Pa), Inc., in No. 97-1412 United States of Am. v. Attila Horvath, in No. 97-1413 in No. 97-1467 Not a Party to the en Banc Proceeding United States of Am. v. Richard J. Lukesh, in No. 97-1414, 205 F.3d 657 (3d Cir. 2000). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 4, 1999
Docket
No. 97-1412
Citations
173 F.3d 9141999 WL 329277

Opinion

173 F.3d 914

UNITED STATES of America v. UNIVERSAL REHABILITATION SERVICES (PA), INC., Appellant. Richard J. Lukesh, Appellant.

Nos. 97-1412, 97-1414, 97-1468.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

May 4, 1999.

Present: BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, SCIRICA, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, MCKEE, and RENDELL, Circuit Judges.

Prior report: 167 F.3d 172

ORDER

BECKER, Chief Judge.

It is hereby ORDERED that 1

1. The motion to vacate the Order granting rehearing en banc is denied;

2

2. The motion for leave to file a response to Government's Petition for Rehearing is denied; and 3

3. The case number 97-1468 is hereby removed from the Order dated April 15, 1999 granting Rehearing En Banc.

4

The parties shall file supplemental memoranda in which they set forth what factors should be considered by the District Court in ruling on the admissibility of a testifying co-conspirator's guilty plea; what Third Circuit cases set forth these factors as a consideration; and how these factors apply to the facts of the case before us. Appellant shall file a memorandum within 3 weeks and the Government shall have 2 weeks to reply.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2000: 220002026peak 2000 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list