Tim v. State
Ve Ve Muriel TIM v. STATE of Florida
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to our prior decision in Sotolongo v. State, 530 So.2d 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), in which we reversed the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence filed by appellant’s codefendant, and because the facts in both cases are indistinguishable, the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress evidence is reversed. We reject the state’s argument that the “good faith” exception to the warrant requirement enunciated in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984), should apply.
LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.