United States v. One Toshiba Color Television Two Answering MacHines One Health Tech Computer, Reginald McGlory (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c
United States v. One Toshiba Color Television Two Answering MacHines One Health Tech Computer, Reginald McGlory (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-Cv-00138) United States of America v. Assorted Jewelry, Reginald McGlory (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) (d.c. Civ. No. 90-00370)
Opinion
183 F.3d 866 (3rd Cir. 1999)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE TOSHIBA COLOR TELEVISION; TWO ANSWERING MACHINES; ONE HEALTH TECH COMPUTER, Reginald McGlory, Appellant (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), F.R.A.P.) (D.C. Civ. No. 90-cv-00138) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ASSORTED JEWELRY, Reginald McGlory, Appellant (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), F.R.A.P.) (D.C. Civ. No. 90-00370)
NOS. 98-3578 and 98-3579
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Filed July 19, 1999
Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, MANSMANN GREENBERG, SCIRICA, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, McKEE, and RENDELL, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Becker, CHIEF JUDGE 1
A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above appeals, it is 2
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court list the above cases for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the Court.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.