Gerbige v. State
Ronald R. Gerbige v. State.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT McMILLAN, Judge.
Pursuant to Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255 (1989), we hold that the appellant’s claim that the State failed to produce sufficient evidence to sustain his conviction of receiving stolen property in the first degree is precluded under Temp. Rule 20.2(a)(3) and (5), A.R.Cr.P. Appellant’s claim that his appellate counsel was ineffective because of a failure to file a brief on direct appeal is without merit, Ex parte Dunn, 514 So.2d 1300 (Ala.1987), because the appellant consented to his attorney’s not filing a brief.
AFFIRMED.
All the Judges concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.