Pine Island Lumber, Inc. v. Festa
PINE ISLAND LUMBER, INC. v. Michael FESTA, et ux.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
McDONALD, Justice.
In Festa v. Pine Island Lumber, Inc., 561 So.2d 345, 345-46 (Fla.2d DCA 1990), the district court certified the following question as being of great public importance:
CAN A NONPARTY RECOVER COSTS IT HAS INCURRED ON BEHALF OF A NAMED PARTY UNDER THE RULE AND STATUTES REGARDING OFFERS OF JUDGMENT, OR ARE COSTS RECOVERABLE UNDER THOSE PROVISIONS ONLY BY PARTIES WHO HAVE PAID COSTS OR INCURRED LIABILITY TO DO SO?
We recently answered this question in Aspen v. Bayless, 564 So.2d 1081, 1082 (Fla.1990), and held “that a party is not precluded from recovering costs ... when someone other than the named party pays or advances those costs.” Therefore, we quash Festa and direct the district court to affirm the award of costs to Pine Island.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.