TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Henry v. State

Andre HENRY v. The STATE of Florida

Henry v. State, 576 So. 2d 409 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 19, 1991
Docket
No. 89-2781
Judges
Barkdull, Ferguson, Gersten
Citations
576 So. 2d 4091991 Fla. App. LEXIS 23491991 WL 35292

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Andre Henry, appeals his sen-, tence under the habitual offender statute after being convicted for armed robbery. We affirm.

Appellant contends that although he was subject to habitual offender sentencing based on his prior criminal record, the crime for which he was being sentenced is not covered by section 775.084 Florida Statutes (1989). Appellant argues that section 775.084 does not provide for habitual offender sentencing for first degree felonies punishable by life imprisonment.

Appellee, State, asserts that appellant was properly sentenced as a habitual offender. The State maintains that the habitual offender statute specifically provides for sentencing for the crime of armed robbery in section 812.13(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1989).

Section 812.13(2)(a) provides:

If in the course of committing the robbery the offender carried a firearm or other deadly weapon, then the robbery is a felony of the first degree, punishable by imprisonment for a term of years not exceeding life imprisonment or as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083 or s. 775.08f [Emphasis added.]

Appellant was convicted of robbery while carrying a firearm, and sentenced under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989).

Section 775.084(4)(a) provides in pertinent part:

The court ... shall sentence the habitual felony offender as follows: 1. In the case of a felony of the first degree, for life.

Appellant was sentenced to life. We find no error. See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 564 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1992: 319922026peak 1992 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lamont v. State597 So. 2d 823 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
  2. Young v. State600 So. 2d 24 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
  3. Henry v. State596 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 1992)

Most recent

  1. Young v. State600 So. 2d 24 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
  2. Lamont v. State597 So. 2d 823 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
  3. Henry v. State596 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 1992)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Johnson v. State, 564 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990) 25

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list