TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Diaz v. Xtra Super Food Centers, Inc.

Maria DIAZ v. XTRA SUPER FOOD CENTERS, INC.

Diaz v. Xtra Super Food Centers, Inc., 579 So. 2d 893 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 28, 1991
Docket
No. 90-2350
Judges
Cope, Nesbitt, Schwartz
Citations
579 So. 2d 8931991 Fla. App. LEXIS 48031991 WL 87281

Opinion of the Court — Schwartz

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Mrs. Diaz, a sixty-one year old lady, sued Xtra Super Food Centers, Inc. for injuries caused by a slip and fall at its store. According to each of the three doctors who testified, including a board certified orthopedist who examined her for the defense, she sustained a 50% compression fracture to a lumbar vertebra, a permanent injury which will cause pain throughout her life. There were undisputed unreimbursed medical expenses of $3,200.00 and lost wages of $560.00. A jury found total damages of $5,000.00. 1

We hold that this award — which allocates less than $1,300.00 for all the other damage items, including the intangibles — was grossly inadequate to compensate Mrs. Diaz for the permanent and serious injury she undeniably suffered. See Griffis v. Hill, 230 So.2d 143 (Fla.1969); Dorvil v. Purolator Courier Corp., 578 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Powers v. Johnson, 562 So.2d 367 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), review dismissed, 570 So.2d 1304 (Fla.1990); Goff v. 392208 Ontario Ltd., 539 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). On that basis, the cause is remanded for a new trial on damages only.

Reversed and remanded.

. The jury also found the plaintiff guilty of 60% comparative negligence. No issue is made on appeal of the 60%-40% split in the liability determination.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1991: 11992: 119912026peak 1991 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Dyes v. Spick606 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
  2. Figueredo v. Keller Industries, Inc.583 So. 2d 432 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Most recent

  1. Dyes v. Spick606 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
  2. Figueredo v. Keller Industries, Inc.583 So. 2d 432 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Griffis v. Hill, 230 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 1969) 110
Goff v. Ontario Ltd., 539 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989) 5
Powers v. Johnson, 562 So. 2d 367 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990) 4
Dorvil v. Purolator Courier Corp., 578 So. 2d 294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list