TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Stratford Financial Corp v. Security Pacific National Bank

STRATFORD FINANCIAL CORPORATION and American Airlease Corp. v. SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK, Southern Air Transport, Inc., James H. Bastian, William Langton, Thomas Hewson and Robert Mason

Stratford Fin. Corp v. Sec. Pac. Nat'l Bank, 580 So. 2d 806 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 14, 1991
Docket
Nos. 90-1837, 90-2062
Judges
Barkdull, Levy, Nesbitt
Citations
580 So. 2d 8061991 Fla. App. LEXIS 45711991 WL 76244

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial court holding that the underlying brokerage contract between a New York resident, and a Florida corporation, was an oral agreement, 1 governed by the law of the State of New York, and non-enforceable, because of the New York Statute of Frauds 2 .

The brokerage commission was to be payable out of the proceeds of any closing. The closing took place in New York, there *807 fore, this being the last act to complete the contract, it was a New York contract. See e.g. Charles L. Bowman & Co. v. Erwin, 468 F.2d 1293 (5th Cir.1972); Center Chemical Co. v. Avril, Inc., 392 F.2d 289 (5th Cir.1968); Kane v. Hallmark Ins. Co., 409 F.Supp. 467 (S.D.Fla.1976); Goodman v. Olsen, 305 So.2d 753 (Fla.1974); Wingold v. Horowitz, 292 So.2d 585 (Fla.1974); Ray-Hof Agencies, Inc. v. Petersen, 123 So.2d 251 (Fla.1960); Jemco, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 400 So.2d 499 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Andrews v. Continental Ins. Co., 444 So.2d 479 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Confederation Life Association v. Vega Y Arminan, 207 So.2d 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); 1 WILLISTON ON CONTRACTS § 97, (Third Edition 1957). Moreover, there is no right to recover upon an oral brokerage commission in the State of New York. See Philo Smith & Co., Inc. v. Uslife Corp., 554 F.2d 34 (2d Cir.1977); Hardy-Latham v. Wellons, 415 F.2d 674 (4th Cir.1968); Freedman v. Chemical Const. Corp., 56 A.D.2d 514 , 391 N.Y.S.2d 122 (N.Y.App.Div.1977); Roberts v. Champion International, Inc., 52 A.D.2d 773 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 790 (N.Y.App.Div.1976); Title 7, New York General Obligations Law, § 5-701 (McKinney).

Affirmed.

. Horn & Hardart Co. v. Pillsbury Co., 888 F.2d 8 (2d Cir.1989); City of Yonkers v. Otis Elevator Co., 649 F.Supp. 716 (S.D.N.Y.1986); O'Keeffe v. Bry, 456 F.Supp. 822 (S.D.N.Y.1978); Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp., 305 N.Y. 48 , 110 N.E.2d 551 (N.Y.1953); Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom, Inc., 24 N.Y.2d 372 , 248 N.E.2d 576 , 300 N.Y.S.2d 817 (N.Y.1969).

. The New York Statute of Frauds reads in pertinent part as follows: Section 5-701-AGREEMENTS REQUIRED TO BE IN WRITING (a.) "Every agreement, promise or undertaking is void, unless it or some note or memorandum thereof be in writing, and subscribed by the party to be charged therewith, or by his *807 lawful agent, if such agreement, promise or undertaking;

(10.) Is a contract to pay compensation for services rendered in negotiating a loan ... "Negotiating” includes procurring an introduction to a party to the transaction or assisting in the negotiation or the consummation of the transaction." Title 7, New York General Obligations Law, Section 5-701(a)(10), (McKinney).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1996: 119962026peak 1996 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Trumpet Vine Investments, N v. v. Union Capital Partners I, Inc.92 F.3d 1110 (11th Cir. 1996)

Most recent

  1. Trumpet Vine Investments, N v. v. Union Capital Partners I, Inc.92 F.3d 1110 (11th Cir. 1996)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 18

DepthCaseCited by
Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc., 248 N.E.2d 576 (N.Y. 1969) 263
Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp., 110 N.E.2d 551 (N.Y. 1953) 262
Roberts v. Champion Int'l Inc., 52 A.D.2d 773 (1976) 8
Freedman v. Chem. Constr. Corp., 56 A.D.2d 514 (1977) 3
Philo Smith & Co. v. Uslife Corp., 554 F.2d 34 (2d Cir. 1977) 71
The Horn & Hardart Co. v. The Pillsbury Co., 888 F.2d 8 (2d Cir. 1989) 64
Jemco, Inc. v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 400 So. 2d 499 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981) 53
Goodman v. Olsen, 305 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 1974) 43
Charles L. Bowman & Co., a Mich. Corp. v. C. Ward Erwin, 468 F.2d 1293 (5th Cir. 1972) 30
Ctr. Chem. Co. v. Avril, Inc., 392 F.2d 289 (5th Cir. 1968) 23
Ray-Hof Agencies, Inc. v. Petersen, 123 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 1960) 20
Madeleine Hardy-Latham v. Wellons, 415 F.2d 674 (4th Cir. 1968) 19
O'Keeffe v. Bry, 456 F. Supp. 822 (S.D.N.Y. 1978) 19
Andrews v. Cont'l Ins. Co., 444 So. 2d 479 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984) 18
City of Yonkers v. Otis Elevator Co., 649 F. Supp. 716 (S.D.N.Y. 1986) 18
Confederation Life Ass'n v. Vega Y Arminan, 207 So. 2d 33 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968) 17
Wingold v. Horowitz, 292 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1974) 14
Kane v. Hallmark Ins., 409 F. Supp. 467 (S.D. Fla. 1976) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list