Fontana v. State
Anthony FONTANA v. STATE of Florida
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
OVERTON, Justice.
This is a petition to review State v. Fontana, 566 So.2d 937 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), in which the district court reversed a trial court’s order suppressing cocaine found on the passenger’s side of a car and held that the passenger, Fontana, had no standing to challenge the search. We find conflict with Griggs v. State, 565 So.2d 361 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). 1
The district court’s majority opinion sets forth the facts, and we note that the circumstances of this incident establish that Fontana was lawfully stopped and detained. We find that the district court correctly concluded that Fontana has no standing to challenge the search. We agree that Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 , *586 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), controls and fully approve the opinion of the district court.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J., and McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(passenger who was lawfully stopped lacked standing to challenge the subsequent search of the vehicle where he asserted no ownership or possessory interest in the car or its contents)
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.