United States v. Ballinger
Opinion
369 F.3d 1238
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jay Scott BALLINGER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-14872.
No. 01-15080.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 12, 2004.
Paul S. Kish, Fed. Pub. Def., Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Amy Levin Weil, Atlanta, GA, Christopher A. Wray, U.S. Atty., Office of Dept. Atty. Gen., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Nos. 99-00026-CR-01-2, 01-00032-CR-01-2-WCO); William C. O'Kelley, Judge.
(Opinion Nov. 21, 2002, 312 F.3d 1264 , 11th Cir.2002)
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. *
BY THE COURT:
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Notes:
* Honorable James C. Hill has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46 (c)
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.