Bernstein v. United States Department Of Justice
Daniel J. Bernstein v. United States Department of Justice United States Department of Commerce Department of State United States Department of Defense United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency National Security Agency United States Department of Energy Central Intelligence Agency Madeline E. Albright, United States Secretary of State William M. Daley, United States Secretary of Commerce William Cohen, United States Secretary of Defense Kenneth A. Minihan, Director, United States National Security Agency John B. Holum, Director, United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency William G. Robinson Gary M. Oncale Ambassador Michael Newlin Charles Ray Mark Koro Greg Stark
Opinion
192 F.3d 1308 (9th Cir. 1999)
DANIEL J. BERNSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; DEPARTMENT OF STATE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; UNITED STATES ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY; NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY; CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; MADELINE E. ALBRIGHT, United States Secretary of State; WILLIAM M. DALEY, United States Secretary of Commerce; WILLIAM COHEN, United States Secretary of Defense; KENNETH A. MINIHAN, Director, United States National Security Agency; JOHN B. HOLUM, Director, United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency; WILLIAM G. ROBINSON; GARY M. ONCALE; AMBASSADOR MICHAEL NEWLIN; CHARLES RAY; MARK KORO; GREG STARK; Defendants-Appellants.
No. 97-16686
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Filed September 30, 1999
HUG, Chief Judge:
1
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Bernstein v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 176 F.3d 1132 (9th Cir. 1999), is withdrawn.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.