TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Allstate Indemnity Company v. Vina Stump

Allstate Indemnity Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Vina Stump, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Harold Stump Vernon the Boy as Personal Representative of the Estate of Victor the Boy and Arthur Windy Boy, Associate Judge, Chippewa Cree Tribal Court, in His Official Capacity Only

Allstate Indem. Co. v. Vina Stump, 197 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 1999)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 15, 1999
Docket
No. 97-35822
Citations
197 F.3d 103199 Daily Journal DAR 1151599 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 90281999 U.S. App. LEXIS 35872

Opinion

197 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 1999)

ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. VINA STUMP, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF HAROLD STUMP; VERNON THE BOY AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF VICTOR THE BOY; AND ARTHUR WINDY BOY, ASSOCIATE JUDGE, CHIPPEWA CREE TRIBAL COURT, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY ONLY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

No. 97-35822

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Argued September 16, 1998 Submission deferred September 28, 1998 Resubmitted January 8, 1999 Decided August 19, 1999 Amended September 13, 1999. Second Amended November 15, 1999 1

Appeal from the United states District Court for the District of Montana; Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-97-00082-DWM

Prior report: 191 F.3d 1071

ORDER 2

The opinion filed August 19, 1999, amended September 13, 1999, is further amended as follows:

3

At slip opinion page 9461, lines 9-14, delete "the Supreme Court there affirmed . . . only if the Strate futility exception applies." Substitute "the Supreme Court there held that exhaustion was not required where it is evident that the tribal court lacks jurisdiction, not that the exhaustion requirement has been abolished altogether."

4

Page 9461, line 18, delete "Exhaustion, however, cannot be waived."

5

Page 9463, lines 9-13: delete "Generally speaking. . . been unnecessary."

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list