Crystalline S. Bailey v. Anchor Packaging, Etc.
Crystalline S. BAILEY, Appellant, v. ANCHOR PACKAGING, Etc., Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff Crystalline S. Bailey appeals the district court’s 2
grant of summary judgment for defendant Anchor Packaging on plaintiffs employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the matter de novo and conclude that the evidence, considered in the light most favorable to Bailey, shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
See Treanor v. MCI Telecomm. Corp., 200 F.3d 570, 573 (8th Cir.2000). The district court correctly ruled that defendant took prompt and appropriate remedial action after plaintiff complained that a co-worker had sexually harassed her.
See Sens a v. Nestle U.S.A. Co., 181 F.3d 958, 967 (8th Cir.1999).
We affirm the judgment of the district court.
2
. The Honorable Heniy Woods, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(affirming grant of summary judgment when employer initiated prompt and appropriate remedial action after employee lodged a harassment complaint)
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.